- Mēs nosūtīsim 10-14 darba dienu laikā.
/images/books/4794190/9781006313653.jpg)
- Extra -10% atlaide, ievadot kodu: EXTRA
Atsauksmes
Apraksts
Phædo or Phaedo also known to ancient readers as On The Soul, is one of the best-known dialogues of Plato's middle period, along with the Republic and the Symposium. The philosophical subject of the dialogue is the immortality of the soul. It is set in the last hours prior to the death of Socrates, and is Plato's fourth and last dialogue to detail the philosopher's final days, following Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito.
One of the main themes in the Phaedo is the idea that the soul is immortal. In the dialogue, Socrates discusses the nature of the afterlife on his last day before being executed by drinking hemlock. Socrates has been imprisoned and sentenced to death by an Athenian jury for not believing in the gods of the state (though some scholars think it was more for his support of "philosopher kings" as opposed to democracy) and for corrupting the youth of the city
10 EXTRA % atlaide
Kupona kods: EXTRA
Akcija beidzas 7d.07:20:40
Atlaides kods derīgs pirkumiem no 10 €. Atlaides nav kumulatīvas.
Derīgs tikai pirkumiem tiešsaistē.
- Autors: Plato
- Izdevējs Blurb
- Gads: 2022
- Lapas: 120
- ISBN-10: 1006313656
- ISBN-13: 9781006313653
- Formāts 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.6 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Valoda: Anglų
Phædo or Phaedo also known to ancient readers as On The Soul, is one of the best-known dialogues of Plato's middle period, along with the Republic and the Symposium. The philosophical subject of the dialogue is the immortality of the soul. It is set in the last hours prior to the death of Socrates, and is Plato's fourth and last dialogue to detail the philosopher's final days, following Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito.
One of the main themes in the Phaedo is the idea that the soul is immortal. In the dialogue, Socrates discusses the nature of the afterlife on his last day before being executed by drinking hemlock. Socrates has been imprisoned and sentenced to death by an Athenian jury for not believing in the gods of the state (though some scholars think it was more for his support of "philosopher kings" as opposed to democracy) and for corrupting the youth of the city
Atsauksmes